Why doesn’t the universe run out of energy?

Written by Lee Stevenson

Why doesn’t the universe run out of energy. Why does this energy not burn out?

Mass is energy and energy is mass. This is how Einstein came up with E-MC2. But energy burns out and gets spent eventually so how does it keep getting replenished. Scientist have been trying to solve this problem for decades because based on mathematical models the universe should be out of energy. Scientist have been predicting the end of the universe for decades but their mathematical models do not support this theory. There seems to be some unknown energy source that keeps replenishing the energy in the universe. Scientist cannot figure out where this extra energy is coming from. They have come up with a theory that dark energy keeps fueling the energy needs of the universe. Even if that theory was proven to be true they would have to ask where is the dark energy getting it’s energy from?

So we need to ask ourselves why does the function of the universe defy all scientific models? This is because they do not consider the fact the universe had a creator who is unlimited in power. Not only is he unlimited in power but God cannot die so will live forever, his energy can keep sustaining the universe forever.

Just a side note you notice that the bible mentions someone being with God during the creation of everything. We also know Jesus was referred to as the word because he delivered God’s word to man. So you will notice he was the first born of all creation and worked with God in creating everything, this is why the bible refers to Jesus as the master worker. The bible tells us we must acknowledge that Jesus is God’s son but many reject this and call Jesus God even though Jesus himself never made himself equal to God. This is why God referred to Jesus as his master worker. This is why Jesus is called the only begotten son. Jesus is the only one created directly by God. God has appointed Jesus king on the heavenly throne. When Jesus work is done he will hand the throne back over to his father. If he was God he would have no need to hand the throne back to his father. This is why the bible tells us God is the head over everything including Christ. So by refusing to admit that Jesus is the first born son of God, we are not only rejecting Jesus but we are also rejecting God. By calling the son God we refuse to acknowledge God is the head of everything. By refusing to admit Jesus is the only begotten son we reject he was created meaning there really would have been no ransom because there would have been no son to ransom if Jesus was God.

(Genesis 1:1-28) 1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. ² Now the earth was formless and desolate, and there was darkness upon the surface of the watery deep, and God’s active force was moving about over the surface of the waters. ³ And God said: “Let there be light.” Then there was light. ⁴ After that God saw that the light was good, and God began to divide the light from the darkness. ⁵ God called the light Day, but the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, a first day. ⁶ Then God said: “Let there be an expanse between the waters, and let there be a division between the waters and the waters.” ⁷ Then God went on to make the expanse and divided the waters beneath the expanse from the waters above the expanse. And it was so. ⁸ God called the expanse Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day. ⁹ Then God said: “Let the waters under the heavens be collected together into one place, and let the dry land appear.” And it was so. ¹⁰ God called the dry land Earth, but the collecting of the waters, he called Seas. And God saw that it was good. ¹¹ Then God said: “Let the earth cause grass to sprout, seed-bearing plants and fruit trees according to their kinds, yielding fruit along with seed on the earth.” And it was so. ¹² And the earth began to produce grass, seed-bearing plants and trees yielding fruit along with seed, according to their kinds. Then God saw that it was good. ¹³ And there was evening and there was morning, a third day. ¹⁴ Then God said: “Let there be luminaries in the expanse of the heavens to make a division between the day and the night, and they will serve as signs for seasons and for days and years. ¹⁵ They will serve as luminaries in the expanse of the heavens to shine upon the earth.” And it was so. ¹⁶ And God went on to make the two great luminaries, the greater luminary for dominating the day and the lesser luminary for dominating the night, and also the stars. ¹⁷ Thus God put them in the expanse of the heavens to shine upon the earth ¹⁸ and to dominate by day and by night and to make a division between the light and the darkness. Then God saw that it was good. ¹⁹ And there was evening and there was morning, a fourth day. ²⁰ Then God said: “Let the waters swarm with living creatures, and let flying creatures fly above the earth across the expanse of the heavens.” ²¹ And God created the great sea creatures and all living creatures that move and swarm in the waters according to their kinds and every winged flying creature according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. ²² With that God blessed them, saying: “Be fruitful and become many and fill the waters of the sea, and let the flying creatures become many in the earth.” ²³ And there was evening and there was morning, a fifth day. ²⁴ Then God said: “Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds, domestic animals and creeping animals and wild animals of the earth according to their kinds.” And it was so. ²⁵ And God went on to make the wild animals of the earth according to their kinds and the domestic animals according to their kinds and all the creeping animals of the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. ²⁶ Then God said: “Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness, and let them have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and the domestic animals and all the earth and every creeping animal that is moving on the earth.” ²⁷ And God went on to create the man in his image, in God’s image he created him; male and female he created them. ²⁸ Further, God blessed them, and God said to them: “Be fruitful and become many, fill the earth and subdue it, and have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living creature that is moving on the earth.”

(Nehemiah 9:6) ⁶ “You alone are Jehovah; you made the heavens, yes, the heaven of the heavens and all their army, the earth and all that is on it, the seas and all that is in them. And you preserve all of them alive, and the army of the heavens are bowing down to you.

(Colossians 1:13-17) ¹³ He rescued us from the authority of the darkness and transferred us into the kingdom of his beloved Son, ¹⁴ by means of whom we have our release by ransom, the forgiveness of our sins. ¹⁵ He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation; ¹⁶ because by means of him all other things were created in the heavens and on the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All other things have been created through him and for him. ¹⁷ Also, he is before all other things, and by means of him all other things were made to exist,

(John 1:1-3) 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god. ² This one was in the beginning with God. ³ All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence.. . .

(Revelation 4:10, 11) . . .: ¹¹ “You are worthy, Jehovah our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power, because you created all things, and because of your will they came into existence and were created.”

(Job 36:26) ²⁶ Yes, God is greater than we can know; The number of his years is beyond comprehension.

(Psalm 90:2) Before the mountains were born Or you brought forth the earth and the productive land, From everlasting to everlasting, you are God.

(1 Timothy 1:17) Now to the King of eternity, incorruptible, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.

(Isaiah 40:26-28) ²⁶ “Lift up your eyes to heaven and see. Who has created these things? It is the One who brings out their army by number; He calls them all by name. Because of his vast dynamic energy and his awe-inspiring power, Not one of them is missing. ²⁷ Why do you say, O Jacob, and why do you declare, O Israel, ‘My way is hidden from Jehovah, And I receive no justice from God’? ²⁸ Do you not know? Have you not heard? Jehovah, the Creator of the ends of the earth, is a God for all eternity. He never tires out or grows weary. His understanding is unsearchable. . .

(Psalm 147:4, 5)  ⁴ He counts the number of the stars; He calls all of them by name.  ⁵ Our Lord is great and is mighty in power;. . .

(Romans 1:19, 20) . . .. ²⁰ For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable.

(Proverbs 8:22-31) ²² Jehovah produced me as the beginning of his way, The earliest of his achievements of long ago. ²³ From ancient times I was installed, From the start, from times earlier than the earth. ²⁴ When there were no deep waters, I was brought forth, When there were no springs overflowing with water. ²⁵ Before the mountains were set in place, Before the hills, I was brought forth, ²⁶ When he had not yet made the earth and its fields Or the first clods of earth’s soil. ²⁷ When he prepared the heavens, I was there; When he marked out the horizon on the surface of the waters, ²⁸ When he established the clouds above, When he founded the fountains of the deep, ²⁹ When he set a decree for the sea That its waters should not pass beyond his order, When he established the foundations of the earth, ³⁰ Then I was beside him as a master worker. I was the one he was especially fond of day by day; I rejoiced before him all the time; ³¹ I rejoiced over his habitable earth, And I was especially fond of the sons of men.

(John 17:5) So now, Father, glorify me at your side with the glory that I had alongside you before the world was.

(Revelation 3:14) ¹⁴ “To the angel of the congregation in La·o·di·ceʹa write: These are the things that the Amen says, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation by God. . .

(1 John 4:15, 16) ¹⁵ Whoever acknowledges that Jesus is God’s Son, God remains in union with such one and he in union with God. ¹⁶ And we have come to know and believe the love that God has for us.. . .

(John 3:16) ¹⁶ “For God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, so that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life.

(Philippians 2:5-8) ⁵ Keep this mental attitude in you that was also in Christ Jesus, ⁶ who, although he was existing in God’s form, gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God. ⁷ No, but he emptied himself and took a slave’s form and became human. ⁸ More than that, when he came as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death, yes, death on a torture stake. . .

(John 14:27, 28) . . .. ²⁸ You heard that I said to you, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would rejoice that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I am.

(1 Corinthians 15:28) But when all things will have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will also subject himself to the One who subjected all things to him, that God may be all things to everyone.

(1 Corinthians 11:3) But I want you to know that the head of every man is the Christ; in turn, the head of a woman is the man; in turn, the head of the Christ is God

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is-matter-really-energy-condensed

http://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/The-Illusion-of-Reality—The-Scientific-Proof-That-Everything-is-Energy-and-Reality-Isnt-Real.pdf

https://astronomy.com/magazine/news/2021/02/the-beginning-to-the-end-of-the-universe-a-cold-lonely-death

Stunning New Image of the Center of Our Galaxy Hints at Previously Unknown Interstellar Energy Source

Was Man Created Or Did We Evolve?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Written by Lee Stevenson, sorry I am a lousy editor.

No Evidence Supporting Evolution.

There is no scientific evidence for the belief in evolution. When scientist make claims of findings supporting evolution and later they have been proven false they fail to remove those claims. Science is not supposed to be based on speculation but yet they teach things that are speculation as if they are fact. If we removed all the findings that have been proven false there would be no evidcnce left to support evolution.

“Some writers,” says Robert Shapiro, professor emeritus of chemistry at New York University, “have presumed that all life’s building blocks could be formed with ease in Miller-type experiments and were present in meteorites. This is not the case.

Consider the RNA molecule. It is constructed of smaller molecules called nucleotides. A nucleotide is a different molecule from an amino acid and is only slightly more complex. Shapiro says that “no nucleotides of any kind have been reported as products of spark-discharge experiments or in studies of meteorites.” He further states that the probability of a self-replicating RNA molecule randomly assembling from a pool of chemical building blocks “is so vanishingly small that its happening even once anywhere in the visible universe would count as a piece of exceptional good luck.”

You can read about a talk he gave on it at this link.

http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2008/10/nyu-chemist-robert-shapiro-decries-rna-first-possibility/

Researcher Hubert P. Yockey, who supports the teaching of evolution, says: “It is impossible that the origin of life was ‘proteins first.’” RNA is required to make proteins, yet proteins are involved in the production of RNA. What if, despite the extremely small odds, both proteins and RNA molecules did appear by chance in the same place at the same time? How likely would it be for them to cooperate to form a self-replicating, self-sustaining type of life? “The probability of this happening by chance (given a random mixture of proteins and RNA) seems astronomically low,” says Dr. Carol Cleland, a member of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Astrobiology Institute. “Yet,” she continues, “most researchers seem to assume that if they can make sense of the independent production of proteins and RNA under natural primordial conditions, the coordination will somehow take care of itself.” Regarding the current theories of how these building blocks of life could have arisen by chance, she says: “None of them have provided us with a very satisfying story about how this happened.”

Francis S Collins a geneticist who led the U.S. Government’s effort to decipher the human genome (DNA), said “Selfless altruism presents a major challenge for the Evolutionist. It cannot be accounted for by the drive of individual selfish genes to perpetuate themselves” He also said “Some people sacrificially give of themselves to those who are outside their group with whom they have absolutely nothing in common. That doesn’t seem like it can be explained by the Darwinian models.” With Darwinian models it would be survival of the fittest but yet that works contrary to that.

 

^{Do Findings Of Neanderthals Support Evolution?}

^{Recent discoveries have shown that Neanderthals were very intelligent. Erik Trinkans , professor of Physical anthropology at Washington University stated “Neanderthals were people, and they probably had the same range of mental abilities we do. “ Capabilities once thought unique to us have been shown be recent discoveries to have been linked to so called Neanderthals. New Scientist Said “Recent discoveries indicate that Neanderthals built shelters and hearths, controlled fire, wore cloths, and created glue to attach spear points to a shaft.” There is also evidence that they cared for sick individuals, wore symbolic ornaments and buried their dead. Does this sound like things that a primitive person would do.}

^{They try to make claims that apes are proof of evolution. If that is the case why are they still here wouldn’t they have evolved into humans by now. They say that ape DNA is only two 2% different then mans. Anyone who know biology knows that is a huge leap.}

^{They make drawings of what they perceive Neanderthals looked like and yet they don’t have accurate evidence to do that. Forensics expert Carl N Stephan says “Attempts to reconstruct evolution of man with drawings are likely biased, grossly inaccurate and invalid.” His conclusion is “Any facial reconstructions of earlier humanoids are likely to be misleading” In 2008 Scientific American said “Scientist have failed to find correlation between absolute or relative brain size and acumen among humans and other. Neither have they been able to discern parallel between wits and the size or existence of specific regions of the brain , except perhaps Brocas area” which is used for speech. A lot of research has show that whales and other animals have a language of sorts. Anyone who has owned a dog knows they even have their own barks that indicate different things. They have their happy to see you bark. They have their hey this is my property bark etc. So even that is not proof of evolution.}

^{Science has shown that if an animal has a mutation of one extra or one less chromosome they usually can’t reproduce and in the rare instance that they can reproduce they are usually weakened or disabled in some way that would hinder their ability to survive making it unlikely to pass those genes on. I have never read any evidence showing these mutations result in a higher species.}

^{Donald Chittick a Physical chemist who earned a doctorate degree at Oregon State University said “A direct look at the fossil record would lead one to conclude that animals reproduced after their own kind as Genesis states. They did not change from one kind into another. The evidence now as in Darwin’s day is in agreement with the Genesis record of direct creation.”}

^{Earths Symbiotic Relationships Disprove Evolution.}

^{The very fact that almost all life on earth is dependent on each other is proof in itself the impossibility of evolution. Almost all life is dependent on each others existence. The loss of one species of plants or animals can wipe out many others. If we came from a soup of molecules how would multiple of life forms come into existence that are very different but yet dependent on each other? Even fossil evidence shows that those symbiotic relationships have always been there. The bee is Dependant on the flower and the flower is dependent on the bee. There are thousands of examples of symbiotic relationships.}

^{The law of genesis in biology teaches only life can produce life. But they ignore this law with their theories on evolution so they will never be able to answer the question, which came first the chicken or the egg? . For those who believe in a creator they know the answer because they know the creator designed the chicken first. The egg would have needed the mother bird to protect and keep it warm until it hatched.}

^{Scientist have been trying to make a man made cell. Even if they achieve this would it prove that life happened in that molecular soup? Not at all because it has taken a lot of energy,equipment, and knowledge to even get close to making a man made cell.}

^{This reminds me of a joke a friend told me. All the world scientist got to talk to God and they said we don’t need you anymore because we can do everything ourselves, even make a man. God listens and says oh really prove it. The scientist get all their equipment gathered up and they go and gather some dirt up and get ready to go to work and then God responds ah ah ah, get your own dirt.}

^{The Coelacanth Fish}

^{You might ask how can a fish prove that evolution theorist are wrong. Well scientist used to believe from fossils records that the Coelacanth fish had legs, feet and lungs and could walk on land. In 1938 scientist discovered that they still existed and that their skeletal system remained the same. They did not have legs and feet or lungs as they speculated.}

^{The Big Bang Theory}

^{How does the big bang theory prove that we had a creator. It is very simple most scientist agree that all the energy and matter seems to have come out of no where. The only explanations that could be possible is the universe was created.}

^{Mans Conscience}

^{In conclusion the fact that we have a conscience disproves the evolution theory. Based on the evolution theory something like a conscience would make you weaker and is in contradiction with the survival of the fittest. So why do we have a conscience? Romans 2:14-15 shows we are born with a conscience.}

What gets me is they are finding the supposed neanderthals were much more advanced then they once claimed.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0514-3

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6378/912

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13422

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/9/eaat6925

Looks like science is quietly throwing evolution out the window. Scientific evidence does not support the possibility of it. Study after study shows how improbable it is to have a mutation form a functional gene.

https://elifesciences.org/articles/32472

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09105#B4

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15321723

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022519377900443

The molecules already existed and the organisms use them to adapt. This is not evolution but adaptation.

https://aem.asm.org/content/61/5/2020.long

There is also the complication of epistasis is the interaction between genes. When one fail it will effect the outcome. Either by causing it to be ignored or by ending the process. This results in a diseased state. There have been no studies showing a healthy outcome when this occurs.

https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/11/20/2463/616080

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28721485

Then you get papers like this that argue for evolution but use wording showing that things were engineered and that the changes were adaptive. The proteins are in nature and used by the genes to make adaptations but the genes themselves do not change. Reports like this are plague with wording that contradicts the very claims they are making.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219720/

http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/6/2/33